Ghana’s education system continues to rely heavily on high-stakes theoretical examinations to
determine learners’ progression and future opportunities. This model, while deeply entrenched,
fails to capture the diverse intelligences, practical skills, and lived experiences of students. This
article challenges the status quo, illustrating the structural flaws in the current assessment regime
and the damaging consequences it imposes on learners especially those from marginalized
backgrounds. Using the real-life stories of Akosua and Kwame, the piece exposes the human cost
of exam-centered evaluation and calls for urgent, holistic reforms in national education
assessment. It concludes with actionable recommendations for building a fairer and more inclusive
system that reflects the full range of learner potential.
Introduction
The true aim of education extends far beyond the ability to disgorge facts or complete multiple-
choice tests. Rather, it should empower young people to think critically, create purposefully, and
contribute meaningfully to their communities and nation. Unfortunately, Ghana’s education
system, though rich in aspirations, is undermined by an outdated and rigid assessment structure.
Examinations such as the Basic Education Certificate Examination (BECE) and the West African
Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE) have become the ultimate arbiters of a learner’s
future, placing disproportionate emphasis on a few hours of standardized testing while sidelining
the years of growth, learning, and talent development that take place in the classroom and beyond.
As an advocate for youth development, I find it deeply troubling that the voices of educators,
parents, and learners continue to be ignored in reform efforts. Our current model not only
misrepresents learners’ capabilities but also subjects them to immense emotional and
psychological strain. It reinforces narrow definitions of success and stifles the emergence of
innovative, hands-on problem solvers the very individuals Ghana needs for its national
transformation.
A System That Fails the Future Leaders
Akosua, a 15-year-old from a deprived rural community, spent nine years preparing for her BECE.
She was a brilliant, hands-on learner capable of building electrical circuits and assisting her father
in mechanical repairs. But a week before her exam, tragedy struck: her mother died. Emotionally
shattered, Akosua could not perform well in the examination. Her results? Low grades in
Mathematics and English deemed “core” subjects. The result? Rejection from all public secondary
schools. Her dream of becoming an engineer was cut short not because she lacked ability, but
because the system judged her potential through a narrow window of time.
Kwame, a 16-year-old student in a rural school in Ghana’s Eastern Region, provides a
heartbreaking example of the system’s failure. Although he struggled academically in English and
Social Studies, he excelled in practical skills. He could dismantle and rebuild mechanical devices,
wire simple circuits, and construct wooden structures with skill far beyond his years. His teachers,
peers, and community recognized his gift, often turning to him for repairs and assistance with
technical problems. However, when the time came to write the BECE, none of these abilities were
assessed.
The exam, like so many others before it, focused entirely on theoretical knowledge multiple-choice
questions, essay writing, and abstract problem-solving. There was no room for Kwame to
demonstrate his mechanical talent or defend a practical project. Unsurprisingly, he did not attain
the grades required for admission into a senior high school. His parents, already burdened by
financial hardship, could not afford private vocational training. Disheartened and excluded by a
system that never recognized his strengths, Kwame dropped out of formal education altogether.
This is not an isolated incident. Thousands of students across the country, especially in under-
resourced rural schools, suffer similar fates. They are not failures by any genuine measure of
potential they are simply unseen by a system that refuses to evolve.
Structural Flaws in Ghana’s Assessment System
At the heart of Ghana’s education crisis lies the disproportionate reliance on external examinations.
With 70% of a student’s final evaluation determined by an external body like WAEC, learners are
judged almost entirely through impersonal, paper-based assessments. These exams, administered
without consideration for the student’s context or learning journey, provide a snapshot at best and
a distorted one at worst of the child’s true capabilities.
Compounding this issue is the limited value placed on continuous assessment. Teachers, who
engage with students daily and observe their progress across cognitive, emotional, and practical
domains, contribute only 30% to the final grade. Their professional insight, shaped over years of
classroom interaction, is often dismissed in favor of a single examination that sees the learner only
once, on one day, under artificial conditions.
Moreover, the assessment structure makes no room for learners experiencing personal crises.
Illness, bereavement, emotional trauma, and unforeseen disruptions are all part of the human
experience, yet the system provides no formal mechanism to accommodate them. A child who
loses a parent the week of an exam is expected to perform at full capacity or risk forfeiting years
of schooling. For many, like Kwame, such moments become turning points that end their academic
journey prematurely.
Equally troubling is the narrowness of the assessment scope. The overwhelming emphasis on
theoretical knowledge marginalizes students with practical, vocational, artistic, or kinesthetic
intelligence. There are no structured opportunities for learners to showcase creativity,
craftsmanship, or community service. As a result, students who may have excelled in engineering,
carpentry, design, or entrepreneurship are left feeling inadequate, simply because they do not
thrive in memorization-based exams.
Finally, socio-economic inequity is baked into the system. Students from urban centers and
affluent families often have access to private tutoring, quality preparatory materials, internet-
enabled resources, and emotionally stable home environments. Their rural and less privileged
peers, by contrast, face enormous obstacles yet are held to the same national standard. The result
is an assessment regime that widens the gap between the elite and the marginalized, rather than
closing it.
Causes of the Crisis
Several structural and historical forces have contributed to the current state of affairs. First,
Ghana’s reliance on standardized exams is a legacy of colonial administration, which was never
designed to cultivate broad-based talent but rather to select a narrow elite. That outdated logic
continues to shape the philosophy behind education assessments today.
Second, policy inertia has stalled meaningful reform. Even as global education systems evolve to
include diverse assessments and accommodate different learner profiles, Ghana’s framework
remains rigid and top-down. The perspectives of teachers, students, and parents those most
affected by these policies are rarely solicited in decision-making processes.
Furthermore, the infrastructural capacity to implement alternative assessments is woefully
inadequate. Most schools lack the tools, training, and resources needed to develop portfolios,
conduct project evaluations or implement practical assessments. Without targeted investment,
such reforms remain aspirational.
The Consequences of a Flawed System
The consequences of this broken system are devastating. Learners like Kwame has his
educational journeys cut short not because they lack intelligence, but because the assessment
model does not recognize their form of brilliance. Their sense of self-worth is eroded, as they
internalize failure in a system that was never designed for them. This leads to a tragic waste of
human capital. Talented youth with the potential to become engineers, artisans, innovators, and
entrepreneurs are left behind, untrained and unrecognized.
Moreover, the country as a whole loses out. National development depends on a workforce
equipped with diverse skills and the capacity to solve real-world problems. A system that filters
out such individuals based on theoretical exams undermines its own development agenda. Public
investment in basic education, when followed by such a steep drop-out rate at the point of
assessment, becomes economically inefficient and socially unjust.
A Vision for Reform and the Way Forward
To move Ghana’s education system into the 21st century, we must first adopt a multi-dimensional
model of assessment. Examinations should not be limited to written theory. Instead, they must
include practical demonstrations, oral assessments, project work, and community-based
contributions. Learners should be able to compile portfolios that showcase their growth and
abilities across a range of domains.
A restructured weighting system is also vital. Instead of the current 70:30 imbalance, a 50:50 or
even 60:40 ratio that favors continuous assessment would better reflect the breadth of a student’s
learning journey. Teachers must be empowered to contribute meaningfully to final evaluations,
with internal assessments undergoing moderation rather than marginalization.
Additionally, the country must institutionalize special consideration policies, as seen in
international education systems like the International Baccalaureate (IB) or Cambridge. These
frameworks allow for resist, modular testing, and special dispensations for candidates experiencing
illness or trauma. Ghana’s learners deserve no less.
There is also an urgent need to strengthen vocational and technical learning tracks. These should
be developed as parallel and equally respected routes, not second-class alternatives. Schools must
be equipped to nurture practical skills with the same enthusiasm they show for academic literacy.
Crucially, reform must be coordinated through a national committee comprised of all stakeholders’
teachers, WAEC officials, civil society groups, students, researchers, and education advocates.
Only through collaborative design can a sustainable, effective, and inclusive assessment model be
achieved.
Finally, digital technologies and AI should be explored to pilot new forms of smart assessment.
These tools can personalize testing, track growth over time, and provide more comprehensive data
on learner development far beyond the limits of traditional exams.
Conclusion: A Call for Action
If Ghana is serious about using education as a vehicle for transformation, then the way we assess
learning must fundamentally change. A system that ignores context, dismisses practical
intelligence, and punishes vulnerability is not just outdated it is unjust. It perpetuates inequality,
stifles potential, and deprives the nation of the very talents needed to drive innovation and
development. We must reimagine assessment not as a barrier, but as a bridge one that connects
learners to opportunity, recognizes diverse strengths, and empowers every child to thrive. The time